Page 1 of 3
Basic Scenario - Europe 1814
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 9:22 pm
Let's discuss the basic scenario: "Europe 1814"
What will be the unique properties of this scenario? What challenges will it pose for the players?
I copy from the original Imp1:
7 Great Powers: England 14, France 20, Ottoman Empire 21, Sardinia 8, Prussia 17, Austrian Empire 26, Prussia 28 (Number are provinces)
15 Minor Powers: Portugal 4, Spain 8, Catalonia 4, Marocco 5, North Africa 8, Egypt 5, Greece 5, Switzerland 3, South Germany 4, Sicily 4, Netherlands 6, North Germany 4, Denmark 4, Sweden 4, Poland 4
Do you think this is balanced? Of course we can weight the provinces in their value, otherwise Sardinia shouldn't have any chance?
Also what were the traditional relations between these nations. Who liked whom?
I guess France and England hated each other. Prussia and Austrian Empire rivaled about the same territory. But otherwise I don't know.
Re: Basic Scenario - Europe 1814
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:00 pm
Great Britain and Russian Empire were engaged in 'the great game' for control/influence over Central Asia. This is ofcourse off our map, so don't know if this should be reflected (relation-wise) in this scenario.
Why would Catalonia be independent? Keep Spain together for sake of realism. It would have too much provinces for a minor, so maybe cut a few provinces... or let it be some kind of medium power which has the chance to grow into something bigger. Spain was at the time losing its massive empire, but perhaps it could've been much more if it had managed to keep control?
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 10:58 am
Uniting Spain is a good idea, since we could make it more difficult for France to expand to the south while opening up the possibility of another minor nation going major. There are enough ways to weaken Spain (low initial industry but strong defensive (and expensive) military) so that it will not become too big. And it would even be more historical because IIRC the times where catalonia was independent were long over in 1814.
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 1:13 pm
Trilarion wrote:Uniting Spain is a good idea, since we could make it more difficult for France to expand to the south while opening up the possibility of another minor nation going major. There are enough ways to weaken Spain (low initial industry but strong defensive (and expensive) military) so that it will not become too big. And it would even be more historical because IIRC the times where catalonia was independent were long over in 1814.
That sounds great, IIRC Spain wasn't that industrialised to begin with, when compared to other European powers. Their country was ravaged after the Napoleonic wars (also a main reason why they lost most of South America during these years). Catalonia was never truly independent, yes the Kingdom of Aragon was, but that was in the late 1400s.
So if Catalonia goes, maybe it can be replaced by Tunisia? So we'll have Algeria and Tunisia instead of 'North Africa'.
Re: Basic Scenario - Europe 1814
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 1:25 pm
By the way, some stuff that happens after 1814:
- Serbia becomes vassal of the Ottoman Empire in 1817, totally independent in 1867
- 1821 - 1830 Greece becomes independent of Ottoman Empire
- 1830-1839 Belgium becomes independent of The Netherlands
- 1877 Romania and Bulgaria become independent from Ottomans
If you go further still then Norway chooses independence around 1905 from Sweden.
In my opinion it would be great to have revolters or countries go independent. It's what happened in real life after all! But can the game handle it and if so, how? By event or in-game conditions?
Splitting nations, Independence, Historical Events
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 4:15 pm
Good ideas but some are hard to implement or better should not be implemented in a first version.
Split North Africa in Algeria and Tunisia sounds good. We can just add one or two rows of tiles to the south and extend the map towards Africa a bit. This will result in fights over colonies - hopefully.
I don't want to introduce nationality just now. It is an additional concept that makes everything even more complicated. Surely Norway defected from Sweden because of nationality and not really from geographical or industrial reasons, being so closely situated and well connected. So far I had no idea about splitting Empires. In my view the powers in the world would just eat each other until one and only one is the winner = Imperialism.
Also we do not need to have a very close historical similarity. Especially it should not make the game dependent on these events or unbalance it. As a strategy game, the way the "alternative history" is going should be determined by the actions of the players.
Apart from that we have possibilities to allow splitting of nations:
- A secreat diplomatic mission of other nations (conspiracy)
- Low national cohesion (during a war or when under financial stress)
- Scripted events (playing God - I don't really like it)
- Inbuilt nationality and tendencies to form certain states.
My impression is that it kind of distracts from the strategy part unless it is added as a strategic element. I added it to the ideas list for now, so we will keep coming back to it.
IX. Basic Scenario - Europe 1814
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 2:48 pm
So currently we are working with the imported scenario of the original Imperialism - the first scenario (1820). The industry, diplomacy, military and technology parts will anyway be different, but the geographical (terrain, rivers, provinces, borders, cities, nations) part is the same. For copyright reasons we have to change scenario here and there to make it our own before publishing. I think I squeezed out all useful information from the old scenario files. Now ideally we could use the ingame editor to change the scneario.
The editor is currently not capable of changing much, rather only displaying. But I am working on it. When it's done anyone can improve this scenario.
Here we should discuss these changes. And you can already now post all your ideas, what should be changed in this basic scenario geographical wise (names, sizes, locations of provinces, nations, rivers, terrain, ressources, ...)?
Balancing, experiences from the original
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 1:24 pm
So after some re-playing of the original base scenario I can say that it is quite unbalanced.
- Britain is the high-flyer - there is nothing and nobody that can compete with it, especially not France. What we could do to solve this is make conquering harder (increase initial defense values) as well as isolate Britain diplomatically - so it fears other major nations taking side of any attacked nation.
- France has potential and good industrial base, but a small army and an overpowered neighbour, who can easily block all trade. We should make defense better and find a way for french to still perform some trade, even with a blockade.
- Prussia is small but can industrialize heavily and has some strategic options and a good military - an average nation.
- Russia has a strong army but not much industry and a huge country to develop. Due to their location they can defend themselves very well. Nothing needs to be changed.
- The same for Austria-Hungary.
- Sardinia is like Prussia, can industrialize very quickly, but needs to expand badly.
- Ottoman Empire is more like Russia and challenging. There should be the option to expand in the mediterrenean area more. Also having fights with the russians would be interesting.
Very strong initial army: Britain, Russia
Strong initial army: Prussia, Sardinia
Strong initial defense: France
Very strong initial industrialization: Britain
Strong initial industrialization: France, Prussia, Sardinia
Weak initial industrialization: Austria, Russia, Ottomon
Must expand initially: Sardinia, Prussia, Ottoman
Must defend initially: Austria, France
Free to choose: Britain, Russia
I think we should make it a bit more balanced than it is right now, because otherwise games will happen very, very similarly.
Re: Basic Scenario - Europe 1814
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 2:03 pm
since there is no limit to the amount of countries or provinces I hope to see more of a historical start.
Anyways here is a pretty good map of 1814 Europe (Also "Hungary" is meant to be "Austria" or "Austrian Empire")
Historical accurateness vs. game mechanics
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 3:27 pm
In each scenario: we must choose either historical accurateness or balanced game play, but cannot have both on the same level. Most of the small kingdoms in the middle of the map would be irrelevant in a strategy game and the diplomatic interactions in real life (like marriages or so...) are quite complicated to model. I think a good strategy game needs to be balanced, otherwise there is a dominant strategy and the replayability is not so much fun.
I prefer to have a good strategy game than a historical simulation but others may see it differently. So Europa Universalis or Hearts of Iron is like a deterrent example for me. I try to align myself to approaches like Civilization or Master of Orion and use the historical setting mostly for immersion and explanation of the specific game elements.
So the first scenario should contain balanced major powers. However now that I think of it, fans of historical accurateness could have their own scenario. So we could offer two versions for each time and location that we want to cover. A historical and a balanced version. Depending on the interest in the community we will have many different scenarios.